WHO chief calls US withdrawal reasons 'untrue,' warns of global safety risk

2026-01-25 - 21:05

World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has publicly rejected the Trump administration's justification for withdrawing from the global health body, labeling the stated reasons as false and warning that the decision diminishes security for both the United States and the international community. In a statement posted on social media platform X, Ghebreyesus expressed disappointment with the U.S. departure that became official on January 22 after a mandatory one-year notice period. The WHO chief acknowledged America's historical role as a founding member and significant contributor to global health achievements while reaffirming the organization's commitment to engaging all member states with full respect for their sovereignty. WHO Defends Pandemic Response and Impartiality The Geneva-based agency issued a formal response rejecting U.S. claims that it failed in its coronavirus response and obstructed timely information sharing. The WHO asserted it stands by its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and denied allegations of pursuing a politicized agenda favoring nations hostile to American interests. "As a specialized agency of the United Nations, governed by 194 Member States, WHO has always been and remains impartial and exists to serve all countries," the organization stated, emphasizing its constitutional mandate to advance health as a fundamental human right. Context of US Withdrawal and Criticisms The withdrawal represents the culmination of years of criticism from President Donald Trump, who consistently attacked the WHO's handling of the pandemic's early stages, its relationship with China, and what he characterized as disproportionate financial burdens on American taxpayers. Trump accused the organization of repeating inaccurate information from Beijing and politicizing the crisis, particularly regarding early travel restrictions. His administration followed through on threats to terminate U.S. membership and funding during Trump's second term, ending nearly eight decades of American participation in global health governance established after World War II. Future Implications and WHO's Position Despite the rupture, Ghebreyesus expressed hope for future U.S. reengagement with the WHO while affirming the organization's steadfast commitment to its core mission. The departure raises significant questions about funding gaps, global health leadership, and coordination during future health emergencies. The WHO maintains that its work continues with all remaining member states, though the absence of the world's largest economy and a traditional leader in global health initiatives creates unprecedented challenges for international pandemic preparedness and response mechanisms.